How is our campus dealing with the Response to Intervention program, when this program is mandated but not funded by the state? How is intervention being implemented to meet Tier criteria and help students be successful? Are the students gaining growth with what our campus is doing with RTI?
Through the collaboration with my principal and assistant principal it was discussed that the implementation of the response to intervention program was critical to the success of students. It was noted that many schools are trying to find different ways to implement RTI since they were not allowed to hire interventionist at this time; which lead to restructuring some staff members to handle small groups for intervention. We then decided to ask: "How are we dealing with the Response to Intervention program when it is mandated but not funded by the state?"
Through the collection of intervention tools, universal screeners, student reports and interviews with various teachers and other staff members, I can evaluate all grade levels and what teachers are doing to enhance student performance using the Response to Intervention program. I have collected data from our math and reading universal screeners which the district has given cut scores for both English and Spanish students. These cut scores tell whether students are on or below grade level. Progress monitoring is used to assess student progress or performance in those areas in which they were identified by universal screening as being at-risk for failure. (Dexter and Hughes, 2011)
In our 2010-2011 and 2011-2012 AEIS reports, across subgroups we were very low in Math. Even though we were able to meet the passing percentage in 2010-2011 TAKS scores, we were very low in meeting STAAR standards for 2011-2012. Our 5th grade Special Education students continue to be very low in Math. Students struggling with mathematics may benefit from early interventions aimed at improving their mathematics ability and ultimately preventing subsequent failure. (IES, 2009)
The data collected will allow teachers to see how their grade level and other grade levels are doing to meet RTI. It will present a collaborative environment where the pros and cons of this system can be evaluated. The data can provide a picture for ways to enhance student's achievement and understand how the Response to Intervention program is functioning on our campus.
With the assistance of my administrator, I have all the resources available to conduct my action research. I will have to assure that any student information obtained will not be released and all procedures for confidentiality will apply.
In conducting my action research, I feel that I have adequately addressed the subject of interest. My resources will assist me in the collection of data needed. I believe that through interviewing and conducting surveys I am establishing a collaborate approach in reaching the intended goal of the research. The data will be monitored through data collection and the timeline. I have created the timeline to reflect with when the teachers obtain student information. With the use of the data to make comparisons and evaluations, I will be able to show success in student performance. After all data is shared, principals can determine if there is need for revision or improvement.
I conducted a meeting to introduce the research project during staff development at the beginning of the year. I handed out questionnaires to staff. Since then I have been meeting with teachers, interventionists and collecting data.
I have met several times with interventionist to gather information for progress monitoring every six weeks. We have just instituted RTI Tuesday meeting, in which I am a member of to assist teachers in attaining information in regards to intervention for low performing students. As Lead Bilingual Teachers, I also act as a LPAC representative for ELL students.
References
Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegan, A., Marsh, L., Star, J., and Witzel, B. (2009). Assisting Students Struggling with Mathematics: Response to Intervention (RTI) for Elementary and Middle Schools. Institute of Educational Science.
Dexter D., and Hughes, C. (2011). Progress Monitoring within a Response to Intervention Model., National Center for Learning Disabilities, Inc., Penn State University., http://www.rtinetwork.org/learn/research/progress-monitoring-within-a-rti-model